Example essay on pros and cons of Community Policing

Example essay on pros and cons of Community Policing

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those associated with the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of LawTeacher.

1. Explain community-policing. List the benefits and disadvantages of community policing. Detail the two most points that are important police agencies in utilizing this perspective.

Community Policing brings police and citizens together to stop crime and solve neighborhood problems. The emphasis is on stopping crime before it happens, not responding to calls for service after the crime occurs with community policing. Community policing gives citizens more control over the well being within their community. Community policing means police become the main neighborhood. This can help police get a significantly better sense of resident’s needs and helps residents to build up greater rely upon the authorities. In essence the community joins the authorities department. Those “who believe that community policing is practiced within their neighborhood are more inclined to express favorable opinions of this where can i find someone to write my college paper police.”(Weitzer & Tuch, 2006, p. 45) Together, in partnership, the community and police department work together to accomplish a goal that is common of safer, better place to live. It really is “democracy in action.”(BJA, August 1994, p. 4).

Community policing is observed as an effective method to promote public safety and to enhance the quality of life in a residential area. Community policing plays a role that is pivotal the two defining elements of policing: police-community relations and problem-solving. “First, it will broaden police organization goals …Second, it will affect the way police are organized to perform their goals.” (Weisburd & Braga, 2007, p. 47) Active participation is necessary from the local government to your average citizen to enable community policing to the office. Everybody is responsible for safeguarding the welfare of this neighborhood. The goals of policing are expanded and the perception of community is changed unlike traditional policing methods. Traditional policing assumes that the problems of society are not inside the realm of the authorities department. Traditional police departments are strictly reactive and don’t look beyond efficiently resolving the immediate incident in front of you. Police officers are linked with the dispatcher and rarely have time to accomplish more than answer one call after another. The police department, as an organization, separates itself through the city’s infrastructure and from city services.

Implementing community policing changes the dwelling of policing and exactly how it is managed. Community policing helps build up and bolster the community. It also links the authorities together with grouped community together. The partnership that develops in the long run can ultimately help the police get the underlying causes of crime inside the neighborhood. By getting the community involved, the police have significantly more resources available to them to assist in crime prevention. By familiarizing themselves with the members of the community, officers are more inclined to obtain valuable details about criminals and their activities. They are also more prone to obtain a reliable evaluation associated with the needs of citizens and their expectations for the police.

As previously stated, community policing plays a major part in police-community relations and problem-solving. In order to develop a partnership with all the community, first the authorities must form a relationship that is great a nearby. Law enforcement must make an effort to involve the area with its pursuit to manage crime. Most community concerns and solutions are identified through problem-solving. The objective is to to reduce crime and disorder by diligently examining the attributes of concerns in communities and then applying the most suited solutions that are problem-solving.

With any method of policing you can find going to be advantages and disadvantages. One of the main advantages to community policing is that it reduces fear in the neighborhood. With a rise in police presence within the neighborhood the residents feel more secure. This feeling of security helps the authorities establish trust in the community. As citizen become more active in looking after their community, they begin to understand what officers actually do on a day-to-day basis. This improves police-community relations. Ultimately, total well being for the community improves and crime is reduced. Another advantage is the fact that community policing is flexible and effective at changing. The solutions and methods change while the grouped community changes. If an agenda works in one single community it doesn’t imply that it is going to work in most communities. Community policing allows the community to create solutions that may work within their own neighborhood and to change or eliminate the ones that do not work. Community policing could be implemented in a limitless amount of ways. This is especially valid of problem-solving. They both are only limited by one’s imagination. Community policing offers an array of benefits. Making use that is effective of talents and resources available within communities will help extend severely strained police resources. Also, reduced amounts of crime will allow more police resources to be allocated to services that have the impact that is greatest in the quality of community life.

A major disadvantage is that the only way that community policing is with community involvement.

There must be a well established partnership between your police officers in addition to community. Minus the trust and involvement associated with community, any attempts at community policing will fail. “Police and there would-be partners do not always value the same, and on occasion even compatible, things” (Thacher, 2001, p. 766). Effective community policing requires a commitment that is long-term everyone involved. It’s not a quick fix. Ongoing relationships should be established and maintained. Another disadvantage to community policing is ensuring that the right people are heading within the project. The focus should always be of enhancing the community and never utilising the program to advance their particular personal career or agendas. Also, programs like community policing may be regressive. Oftentimes if you find a problem that will require assistance from the community it look like the people that are same step forward. They are often the homeowners which have longstanding ties to the community. Community policing requires everyone’s involvement, not merely the home owners.

“Over 10 years after it had been first introduced, community policing continues to be the most important innovation in American policing today.” (Forman, Autumn 2002, p. 1) the benefits of implementing community policing still outweigh the disadvantages. Getting the community on the website side can only just benefit the police within their aid to manage and prevent crime. Also, utilizing the police more involved in the day to day activities associated with the community will assist in the revitalization of the community. This may only happen if both law enforcement additionally the community are willing to place in the full time, effort, and patience that is required when implementing the community program that is policing.